WaTunes: RIAA Wins Major Court Ruling Against LimeWire

May 13, 2010 at 2:01 pm Leave a comment

Source: Hypebot

The RIAA and the major labels have won a major court  ruling against LimeWire which,  much like previous lawsuits with Grokster, Kazaa and Morpheus, contends that  the service deliberately encouraged  users to violate copyrights and profited from the infringements.<img class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451b36c69e2013480bcb6b6970c " title="image from www.freeware-central.com” src=”http://www.hypebot.com/.a/6a00d83451b36c69e2013480bcb6b6970c-350wi&#8221; alt=”image from www.freeware-central.com” style=”border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-color: initial; display: block; margin-top: 4px; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 4px; margin-left: auto; height: 82px;” />The court ruling listed 5 factors that, taken together, establish that LimeWire "intended to encourage " infringement: 1) LW’s awareness of substantial infringement by users, 2) their efforts to attract infringing users, 3) their efforts to enable and assist users to commit infringement, 4) LW’s dependence on infringing use for the success of its business; and 5) a failure to mitigate infringing activities.

In the judge's opinion LimeWire's effort to create a legal music service proved that LimeWire understood the the problems of filesharing and could easily have done more to stop it. For example, the company had built a filter that blocked the downloading of copyrighted materials, but users had to turned it on themselves. In contrast, a similar filter in the LimeWire's own music store which barred users from sharing songs they bought there was always operational.

image from 1.bp.blogspot.com"This selective filtering further demonstrates LW’s knowledge of infringement-mitigating technologies and the company’s intentional decision not to employ any such technologies in a way that meaningfully deters LimeWire users’ infringing activities… is a strong indicator of intent to foster infringement."

The parties respond:

LimeWire CEO George Searle shot back in a defiant official statement: LimeWire strongly opposes the Court’s recent decision. LimeWire remains committed to developing innovative products and services for the end-user and to working with the entire music industry, including the major labels, to achieve this mission. We look forward to our June 1 meeting with Judge Wood."

RIAA head Mitch Bainwol disagreed: "LimeWire is one of the largest remaining commercial peer-to-peer services. Unlike other P2P services that negotiated licenses, imposed filters or otherwise chose to discontinue their illegal conduct following the Supreme Court's decision in the Grokster case, LimeWire instead thumbed its nose at the law and creators.  The court’s decision is an important milestone in the creative community’s fight to reclaim the Internet as a platform for legitimate commerce.  By finding LimeWire's CEO personally liable, in addition to his company, the court has sent a clear signal to those who think they can devise and profit from a piracy scheme that will escape accountability."

Posted via email from WaTunes


Entry filed under: Uncategorized.

WaTunes: What’s New In Music Store? (Week of May 10th, 2010) WaTunes: Sony Music says eyeing EMI: report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed